Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 328(20): 2064-2067, 2022 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178700

ABSTRACT

This study uses electronic medical record data to describe monkeypox infections after a single dose of Modified Vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic vaccine, a live, nonreplicating vaccine indicated for prevention of smallpox and monkeypox infection in adults.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Viral Vaccines , Humans , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Monkeypox virus , Vaccinia , Vaccinia virus , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Vaccines/therapeutic use
2.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 90(3): 316-324, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286280

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention requires engagement throughout the PrEP care continuum. Using data from a PrEP navigation program, we examine reasons for PrEP discontinuation. SETTING: Participants were recruited from New York City Health Department Sexual Health Clinics with PrEP navigation programs. METHODS: Participants completed a survey and up to 3 interviews about PrEP navigation and use. This analysis includes 94 PrEP initiators that were PrEP-naive before their clinic visit, started PrEP during the study, and completed at least 2 interviews. Interview transcripts were reviewed to assess reasons for PrEP discontinuation. RESULTS: Approximately half of PrEP initiators discontinued PrEP during the study period (n = 44; 47%). Most participants (71%) noted systemic issues (insurance or financial problems, clinic or pharmacy logistics, and scheduling barriers) as reasons for discontinuation. One-third cited medication concerns (side effects, potential long-term side effects, and medication beliefs; 32%) and behavioral factors (low relevance of PrEP because of sexual behavior change; 34%) as contributing reasons. Over half (53.5%) highlighted systemic issues alone, while an additional 19% attributed discontinuation to systemic issues in combination with other factors. Of those who discontinued, approximately one-third (30%) restarted PrEP during the follow-up period, citing resolution of systemic issues or behavior change that increased PrEP relevance. CONCLUSIONS: PrEP continuation is dependent on interacting factors and often presents complex hurdles for patients to navigate. To promote sustained engagement in PrEP care, financial, clinic, and pharmacy barriers must be addressed and counseling and navigation should acknowledge factors beyond sexual risk that influence PrEP use.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual Health , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/psychology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male
3.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 83(4): 357-364, 2020 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinics providing sexual health care pose unique opportunities to implement HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs. The PrEP program at New York City's Sexual Health Clinics provides intensive on-site navigation for linkage to PrEP care. We assessed uptake of this intervention. METHODS: We categorized men who have sex with men (MSM) without HIV hierarchically as having had (1) HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) use (past year); or (2) selected sexually transmitted infections (STI) (past year); or (3) HIV-diagnosed sex/needle-sharing partners (past 6 months); or (4) expressed interest in PrEP (day of clinic visit). We constructed PrEP cascades and used multivariable regression to examine acceptance of PrEP navigation, referral to a PrEP provider, linkage (<60 days), and PrEP prescription. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred one of 2106 PrEP (62%) patients accepted navigation. Of those, 55% (718/1301) were black or Hispanic MSM. STI and PEP patients had lowest navigation acceptance levels (35%-46%). Of navigated patients, 56% (628/1114) accepted referrals, 46% (288/628) linked to PrEP providers, and 82% (235/288) were prescribed PrEP; overall, 11% of those offered navigation (235/2106) received prescriptions. Navigated MSM with PEP history [adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16 to 1.56)], previous STI (aPR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.45), or HIV-diagnosed partners (aPR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.37) were more likely than those with PrEP interest to accept referrals. Probability of linkage varied by insurance status; prescription did not vary by patient factors. CONCLUSIONS: Although MSM in key priority groups (eg, previous STI) showed low navigation uptake, those who accepted navigation were likely to be referred for PrEP, suggesting a need for expanded up-front engagement.


Subject(s)
Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Sexual Health , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...